Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Obama-care, birth-control, and oral sex by Mike Shaner


Some folks say healthcare is a “right.” Others say free birth control is a right. Neither of these things can be true because rights are natural to us. If no one wanted to be a health-care provider anymore, would we be allowed to enslave people and force them to become doctors? How then can it be a right? We have no right to another individual’s labor. It is absurd and without proper thought to argue otherwise. 

The idea of what constitutes a right requires examination. Just because something may be better for society (not that government mandated healthcare would) doesn’t mean we have a right to it. I can say with a degree of certainty that a full sex life would make me a healthier happier person, but we can’t go around mandating free blow-jobs…can we?

Today the Supreme Court is hearing arguments on the constitutionality of Obama-care, specifically the individual mandate that requires all persons, as a result of living, to buy health insurance. So, those who argue that health-care is a right believe that right must be forced upon people? In what world would that line of thought indicate any degree of logic?

I suspect the Supreme court will uphold the constitutionality of the law—simply because the Supreme court is an agent of the Federal Government and they rarely rule against themselves, but 9 unelected black-robes saying something is so, doesn’t make it so. Unfortunately too many people believe their rights are granted by some law or piece of paper—nothing could be further from the truth.

The Constitution doesn’t grant rights. No law can be passed giving you the right to do something. A right is something you are born with—it is natural. You have the right to pursue happiness, not because some document says so, but because you were born with that ability. Conversely, if a law were passed making it illegal to smile, your right to smile would not be taken away—only the governments protection of that right.

This may seem trivial, some of you are probably saying “I know what a right is,” but far too many do not, and that is why the government is arguing that citizens have the right to be forced to purchase a service.
Prostitution is illegal in most of the United States, but I still have the right to pay a willing adult to perform sexual acts on me, no law can change that—but just like healthcare, I do not have a right to a good blow job—yet…





If you like what we're doing please share with your friends and ask them to share. We could always use donations to help grow the site. If you are a business owner please consider advertising with us. If you have something to sell, give away, or a service to offer, place an ad! Every dollar goes to spread the message of liberty!

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Nominate Ron Paul or reelect Obama


Mike Shaner
January 21, 2012

If the GOP is serious about defeating Obama in the 2012 Presidential race they better swallow the establishment pride and nominate Ron Paul.  Those of us in the liberty movement have been told for years that we must hold our nose and vote for "the lesser of two evils." The ball is now in our court. Libertarians hold the key to the 2012 election.

We have eclipsed the magical 10% number that either party must have to win an election, and we will not compromise. We will not replace one big government statist wearing a blue uniform for another wearing a red uniform. If Ron Paul is not the nominee we will write him in or vote for a Libertarian party candidate. We will not vote for Mitt Romney. We will not vote for Newt. I would rather take a beating than vote for Santorum. He is evil Abe incarnate.

Without the Ron Paul supporters the GOP has absolutely no path to victory. The Republican establishment has been screaming for years "we must nominate the most electable candidate." Let's see if they put their money where there mouth is. This year it is Ron Paul or not at all. The choice is yours: Waste your vote on a big government establishment GOP clone of Obama or vote for liberty. Have the courage of your convictions and vote for the Constitution you claim to care about or continue to ignore it. Champion the limited government principle's in the GOP platform or continue on your corporatist path of destruction. Endorse socialized medicine, socialized education, endless war, the patriot act, assassination and indefinite detention of American citizens or allow peaceful liberty to restore our Republic. You can nominate Ron Paul or waste your vote on another candidate and re-elect President Obama.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Barrack Obama Vs Mitt Romney Vs Ron Paul: Only One Choice


Mike Shaner
January 14,2011


In the spring of 2010 President Obama signed the affordable care act into law. For the first time the Federal Government would actually force Americans to buy a service. U.S. citizens were so outraged that spontaneous protest erupted around the country. People like Glenn Beck were able to achieve their apocryphal 15 minutes by pandering to an enraged mass about the importance of Constitutional obedience. There was a semblance of hope. The country seemed young again. Revolution was in the air. People who had never been politically active before were organizing protest rallies.  I even wrote at the time that we should thank the 111th congress for providing the motivation to reclaim our republic. Those on the left blamed the new found devotion to our founding philosophy as blatant racism manifested in destroying the crowning achievement of our nations first black President. At the time I felt this was a copout argument. Obviously, people were enraged at the gall of a Federal Government that would piss on the constitution and tell it’s citizens what they must purchase. I wonder now if there wasn’t some naivety in my dismissal of their claims.
Here we are two years later and the same people who were carrying pocket Constitutions to tea party rallies have actually made Mitt Romney the front runner to be the Republican nominee for President. That’s right Mitt Romney! The same guy who invented Obama-care. So these noble champions of liberty whose only purpose was to fight government overreach were so disgusted with Obama-care that they push the guy who invented it to replace the President? On what basis? The familiar cry is that Romney stands the best chance of defeating Obama. We  are told that we must unite behind an imperfect candidate or suffer four more years of the Obama regime. Obviously this argument is unfounded, as i’ve noted before Ron Paul is probably the only candidate who actually could defeat President Obama, but let’s say Romney does have the best chance to win; so what? On almost every issue Romney and Obama take the same issues. 
Mitt Romney is a man who proudly claimed not to be a Reagan Republican (bc Reagan was too conservative). He is someone noted as being left of Ted Kennedy. He supported TARP and the bailouts. He believes in the so called Patriot act and aggressive militarism. Most important he believes that some government has the right to tell an individual he must purchase a good or service. I have yet to find one major difference between him and Obama other than skin color and party label. 
Looking back now I’m inclined to believe that collectivist mentality did play a role in the uprising against obama-care and the new found acceptance of Mitt Romney. I don’t believe it is as steeped in racism as it is party loyalty but the collectivist mindset is there all the same. It’s as if some people are ok with the tyranny as long as it is a Republican who prescribes it. Tyranny is tyranny. It’s destruction is the same no matter who is delivering it. What most boggles the mind is that we do have a choice in this election. 
Ron Paul is everything the Tea Party crowd seemed to be clammering for. He is a champion of the Constitution. He has never voted for a tax increase or to raise the debt ceiling. He is the only candidate who understands that the Federal government doesn’t exist to run the economy or provide welfare. He is the only candidate who uses the constitution as his guide for casting a policy vote. The arguments against him are hypocritical when coming from those who claim to care about the Constitution:
“Ron Paul wants to end the Federal war on drugs.”
 Ok...and? That’s because the Constitution doesn’t give the federal government the authority to regulate such a thing. It is a state issue and that’s Ron Paul’s position. If you are a constitutionalist that HAS to be your position as well.
“Ok well Ron Paul is an isolationist and wants to end the wars.” 
In the first place, he is not an isolationist he is a non-interventionist. An isolationist uses protectionist measures to isolate themselves from the rest of the world. Ron Paul wants free trade and prosperity with all nations. It’s the opposite of isolationism. As for war, yes he believes we should be very cautious before jumping into a war. Anyone who disagrees with him should read Washington’s farewell address. He also know it is the job of Congress (not the President) to declare war. If we must go to war, it should be declared by Congress, we should go in, win it, and come home. If you think the Federal Government should be chained by the Constitution you must agree with him. 
“Well, he’s so old and he doesn’t speak very Presidential. Romney is young, good looking, and well spoken. He just seems like a President.” 
That’s just one more thing he and Obama have in common. If you want someone who is well spoken why not just vote for Obama? If the criteria is based on Constitutionalism and liberty Ron Paul is the only choice. In summation I will say that I don’t think racism sparked the Tea Party movement but I do believe it is collectivism and fear that will destroy it. If the choice is between Obama and Romney...what choice is there at all? How would your life be different today if we had a President Romney instead of Obama?

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Could Obama be the biggest warmonger of all?

Mike Shaner
August 18, 2011

According to POLITICO, president Obama has now decided to intervene in the affairs of yet another foreign country. This time it is Syria.

Obama has expanded intervention in unprecedented ways, we are currently in at least 5 different wars. Remember in March when Obama said we would only be involved with Libya for a few days? That conflict is still going on with no end in sight.

It is ironic that Obama is a Nobel peace prize winner, One could suggest he deserves a new title: Greatest Warmongering chickenhawk of all time.


SUBSCRIBE TO THE OAK PARK REPUBLIC










Featured Video: Let's all get on welfare

Related articles:











Thursday, July 21, 2011

A message from Obama

In order to keep this site going I let google place ads above and around my post. When you click on these ads the site is paid a small fee.

About a week ago Obama ads started popping up and curiosity got the better of me. When I clicked the ad I was taken to Obama's campaign site and prompted to join an email list.

I thought it would be wise to see what the enemy was up to. Today I received my first email from the Obama campaign. I am going to share it with you.

Please do not take this to mean that I in any way support the President. I do not but I do think that you should be aware of his agenda and what to look for in his campaign. Soon his supporters will begin to make these arguments and I predict the media will follow suit.

Unfortunately I don't have time to dissect the email at this moment so please feel free to post comments and suggestions.

I hope to be able to respond appropriately in the coming days. Thanks for all of your support and please pass along the info:

Friend --

This morning, a group of public servants showed up to work at a brand-new agency created to protect everyday Americans from the abuses of Wall Street.

They're the folks of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and they'll be the cops on the beat protecting consumers from predatory credit card and mortgage lenders, bait-and-switch creditors, and anyone trying to make a quick buck by deceiving or manipulating Americans who are just trying to secure their financial future.

Many Americans don't know it, but this bureau is just one part of a sweeping Wall Street reform law -- the most pro-consumer and pro-taxpayer reform of our financial system since the Great Depression -- that President Obama signed a year ago today.

Watch this video to get a quick overview of the law, and a briefing on the special interests trying to undermine it:

Learn more about Wall Street reform

Whether you watch the video or not, please share this email with someone.

It's important that everyone knows what this law means for all of us. Simpler mortgages. Clearer credit card rates, fees, and rules. Fairer loan terms. It's based on the simple idea that if you make sure that people get clear information, they'll make the financial decisions that work best for them.

And we can all rest a little easier knowing that our common financial future is more protected from the irresponsibility of a few. This law made structural reforms to ensure that the financial crisis we experienced in 2008 never happens again and that taxpayers aren't on the hook to pay for Wall Street's risky bets.

It's up to you to make sure more people know about this. Most Americans don't have all the details on how this law is working for them, and it's our job to change that.

Take a look, and be sure to pass this one on:

http://my.barackobama.com/Wall-Street-Reform

Amazingly, each and every Presidential candidate on the other side opposes this law.

And the same opposition that tried to block it more than a year ago is still alive and well.

Right now, lobbyists are at work trying to weaken the tough regulations this law imposes.

That's no accident -- its provisions are designed to rein in the Wall Street, credit card, and mortgage banking interests these people represent.

As we know, there aren't a whole lot of high-powered lobbyists in Washington looking out for the common good of everyday families.

That's exactly why this law is necessary, and why our growing organization in all 50 states is so important. It's up to us to make sure our friends and neighbors know about it. Watch our video about Wall Street reform today -- and then pass it on:

http://my.barackobama.com/Wall-Street-Reform

Thanks,

Messina

Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America






the Ron Paul Page




Friday, July 15, 2011

Obama auto czar on bailouts: "I did this all for the unions"


Ron Bloom, the Obama administration's former auto czar who orchestrated the bailout of General Motors Corp. in 2008, responded on Thursday to claims from lawmakers that he lied to Congress.

During a June 22 congressional hearing about the lasting implications of the bailout, Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) asked Bloom if he ever said he "did this all for the unions," a statement that Burton said came from two independent accounts. Bloom, now assistant to the president for manufacturing policy, replied at the time that he was misquoted.



Lawmakers later wrote a letter to Bloom asking him to clarify his remarks. He responded Thursday in a letter to Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Burton.

“I do not recall making the alleged comment that was the subject of Congressman Burton’s inquiry,” Bloom wrote. “Nonetheless, given the amount of time that has passed since the dinner in July of 2009 and the fact that others may have a different recollection, I cannot say with absolute certainty that I did not make the alleged comment.” Full story


Featured Article:

The Legend of Popcorn Sutton




Featured video:

Nullification: Fighting tyranny in your neighborhood




Related:


Ron Paul is not running for house re-election. He is "all in" for the presidency!

 

  

Ron Paul has two messages for Iowans today

 

 

Simply voting out Obama is not the solution

 

 

Also visit the Ron Paul Page

 

 


Please leave a comment, subscribe to the blog, and share it with a friend. Follow me on twitter @ csawordsmith, I'll be on Facebook here, and Linkedin here. Together we can take back our community, take back our state, and take back our Republic. Let the Revolution begin!
If this is a cause you believe in, please consider donating (no amount is too small) or advertising with us. At the very least click on one of the Google ads, subscribe by email, and tell a friend!

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Simply voting out Obama is not the solution

June 30, 2011
Mike Shaner


The more I debate with so called conservatives, the more alarmed I become. Too many feel that simply not electing President Obama will solve all of the country's problems. This is a very dangerous sentiment. Replacing Obama with a clone who happens to have an R in front of his name isn't a solution.

I have heard far too many people say that we should all unite behind the Republican nominee no matter who he is. Many have suggested that the only criteria for nominating the candidate should be electability. I find this attitude to be not only puzzling, but downright frightening!

Nominating a big government Republican diminishes the brand of conservatism, perpetuates government meddling, and leaves the electorate without a choice.

If Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, or Michele Bachmann win the nomination, the best thing that could happen to the elephant party would be for Obama to win re-election.

George W. Bush did more to harm the name of conservatism in 8 years than Democrats have done in 150 years. Most people blame Obama for the massive corporate bailouts but it was Bush who signed TARP into law. Many chastise Obama for the government takeover of healthcare but it was G.W. who signed the Prescription Drug Bill. He also initiated a massive federal takeover of education with No Child Left Behind, got us into two wars, and signed the so-called Patriot Act into law.

Is it any wonder that after 8 years people were confused about what conservatism stood for? Is it a surprise that Bush did such harm to the brand that Democrats took over both houses of Congress, and people dying for "hope and change" elected a radical leftist as president?

This is why I find it incomprehensible that intelligent people would consider nominating Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, or  Mitt Romney.

Bachmann talks a conservative game but her record indicates it's just lip service. She is a former tax collector for Pete's sake! In some ways I find her to be the most disingenuous of the bunch. In public she pays great homage to the constitution but she chose to completely disregard the 4th amendment in favor of supporting the so called patriot act.

Michelle Bachmann claims to be a fiscal hawk who would reign in spending, yet she was the beneficiary of nearly $300,000 in state and federal subsidies. She is also a Keynesian who supported TARP.

In regards to foreign policy she is an established Chicken-Hawk who supported both the Afghan and Iraq wars. Is she slightly less evil than Obama, Romney, or perry? Perhaps, but the lesser evil is still evil.

Romney is the architect of Obama-Care for Pete's sake! He argues that health care is a state issue and that he would never support it on the federal level. It is encouraging that Mr. Romney pretends to consider the 10th Amendment but the fact that he believes it is the role of any government to force citizens to purchase a good or service is appalling. That he believes any government has a right to steal from citizen A and provide for Citizen B speaks volumes and that he believes any government can provide such a service better than the private sector screams even louder.

If Mitt Romney is elected as President of the United States it will be one of the greatest things to ever happen to both the Democratic and Libertarian parties. Unfortunately it will come at the expense of both the Republican party and the United States.

The only thing equal to the devastation of a Romney administration would be a Perry administration. It is astonishing how short political memories can be. It wasn't too long ago that Rick Perry was heading up Al Gore’s Campaign. Yes, Al Gore!

When the political tide began to turn so did Governor Perry. Apparently he found religion, switched parties, and became Mr. Conservative. The only problem is, he isn't.

According to a case study by the American Stewards of Liberty, Gov. Perry endorsed confiscating nearly 500,000 privately owned acres in order to build toll roads to benefit China and Mexico.

No one could stop the Trans-Texas Corridor.  It had the aggressive backing of Governor Rick Perry, the full support of the Texas Department of Transportation (the largest state agency in the nation), and was internationally backed by Cintra-Zachary.  This $80 billion project was on a fast pace to connect the Chinese owned Mexican seaports with Canada, that is, until these five courageous towns and their school districts invoked coordination and took a stand equal in spirit to the Alamo, but with a much better result -- Texans won.

It isn't only land theft that Perry likes to deal in, he like Obama, Romney, and fellow Texan G.W. Bush, also believe government has a role to play in delivering healthcare.

Actually, Perry pushes the envelope even further, the others only want to force us to buy insurance, Perry actually believes it is the role of government to force children to take certain (possibly dangerous) medications.

According to conservativebyte.com, Governor Perry bypassed the state legislature and issued an executive order "making Texas the first state to require that schoolgirls get vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer."

The article goes on to state that "Perry also directed state health authorities to make the vaccine available free to girls 9 to 18 who are uninsured or whose insurance does not cover vaccines. In addition, he ordered that Medicaid offer Gardasil to women ages 19 to 21."


The plethora of rights violated here are too numerous to list but a quick run down would be: The taxpayer who is forced to pay for the "free drugs," The child who is being forced to consume something they may have no desire or need for and which could actually cause them harm, and the parents, who should have the final say as to when to discuss such personal matters as STD's with their children.

Talk about your nanny state! Governor Perry believes it is the role of government to be parent, doctor, and social worker to the children of Texas. What would he do with an entire country and a printing press full of money!


Despite all of this Romney, still leads in most mainstream polls and Perry is climbing fast. The nation fell victim to a smooth talking politician in 2008 and it is still questionable if we can recover from that.

If it happens again from what is supposed to be the opposition party, the results could be catastrophic.

It is time for the electorate to wake up. The President's job is to defend the Constitution of the United States. Look at your candidates record. Are their any inconsistencies? We can no longer afford to waste a vote on someone simply because he may look good in a suit or sound good on a stage.

It is important to remember that simply replacing Obama will do nothing. We must replace him with someone who displays character through adversity, who does what is right even when he is made to look foolish for doing so. Simply changing the wrapping paper from blue to red does not change the value of what's in the box.

We need someone who will defend liberty, the Constitution, and individual rights. So far I have seen one person who offers a true alternative. He too is a Texan, as a Dr. he delivered over 4,000 babies.

As a Congressman, he has been elected to 12 terms and has never voted for a tax increase nor voted to expand government into our private lives.


He is the only candidate in the election to have served in the military, the only one who has ever received an endorsement from Ronald Reagan, and in 2008 Ron Paul earned more campaign contributions from active duty military members than all other candidates combined.

You may have heard he is crazy, too old, an isolationist, or even unelectable. The establishment is terrified of this man and they will say anything to keep you from taking him seriously. I admit Dr. Paul is not for everyone, he isn't a smooth talker, and he's 75 years old, but as my good friend Carl Jones said:

If you don't like Ron Paul, that's fine. Everyone has that right, but don't say "I agree with the founding father's, but disagree with Ron Paul." It's not possible.

If you want a smooth talking politician in office you might as well vote for Obama.

If you want someone who will not cower to the lobbyist and special interest groups and has three decades worth of voting records to prove it, you're only option is Ron Paul.



Other Stories you may like:

The classic liberal and traditional conservative



A call to arms: Tyranny and Nullification


Also visit the Ron Paul Page

 






Please leave a comment, subscribe to the blog, and share it with a friend. Follow me on twitter @ csawordsmith, I'll be on Facebook here, and Linkedin here. Together we can take back our community, take back our state, and take back our Republic. Let the Revolution begin!











Wednesday, June 29, 2011

President Obama Confused about the role of Congress

By Mike Shaner

White house- During a news conference regarding the debt ceiling, President Obama continually referred to members of congress as leaders and accordingly called on them to lead.

 A lot of people say a lot of things to satisfy their base or to get on cable news. Hopefully, leaders at a certain point, rise to the occasion and do the right thing for the American people. That’s what I expect to happen this time. Call me naive, but my expectation is leaders are going to lead.

Much is wrong with this statement. First, the right thing to do for the American people in this instance is to not raise the debt ceiling. It is ludicrous to claim that in order to cut spending we should borrow more! If the President truthfully feels that this is the answer to our spending problem, I am inclined to agree with him, that he is indeed naive.

While his questionable views on economics are disturbing, it is even more bothersome that he feels members of congress are leaders. A leader is in charge of things. Most often it is the employer who is the leader. Members of congress are our employees. They are at most representatives and at least servants. As is the President.

Throughout Obama's first question and answer press conference since March 11, he perpetuated the notion that our public servants are leaders, and repeatedly insinuated they should cross the line of their job description.

If everyone else is willing to take on their sacred cows and do tough things in order to achieve the goal of real deficit reduction, I think it will be hard for Republicans to stand there and say a tax break for corporate jets is sufficiently important that we’re not willing to come to the table and get a deal done.

Of course the “corporate jet” remark was meant to demonize the rich, but his real point here is that members of congress should work together to get a bipartisan deal done. The problem is we did not send them to Washington to be bipartisan. We sent them to defend our liberties and uphold the constitution, which they swore on a bible they would do. As did the President.

Obama suggests that Americans were unwilling to give up weather reports and food safety inspections in order to continue tax breaks for big oil companies and evil rich people. Apparently, the weather would go unreported and the American people would be served dog food if not for the federal government.

This of course, is utter nonsense. The free market would obviously provide higher quality food service at lower prices if not bothered by the heavy hand of big brother, and for those who simply refuse to admit that the market works, local and state governments already do a better job of food inspection than does the FDA.

It is not the job of the federal government to provide weather forecasting and food inspection, nor is it their job to feed, clothe, or care for us. It is their job to defend the liberties of the individual citizen and nothing else. I am surprised Mr. Obama, a former constitutional law professor doesn’t understand this.




Simply voting out Obama is not the solution



A call to arms: Tyranny and Nullification


Also visit the Ron Paul Page

 

The classic liberal and traditional conservative

 



Please leave a comment, subscribe to the blog, and share it with a friend. Follow me on twitter @ csawordsmith, I'll be on Facebook here, and Linkedin here. Together we can take back our community, take back our state, and take back our Republic. Let the Revolution begin!  

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Too Little,Too Late

    President Obama's plan to withdraw 33,000 troops from Afghanistan by September, 2012 is "Too Little, Too Late," According to Ron Paul 2012 Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton. Ron Paul, who is known for his stance against interventionist acts of aggressive war, has long held the position that we should bring all troops home from Afghanistan immediately.

   Congressman Paul was largely ignored in 2003 when he said Osama Bin Laden was most likely in Pakistan. The establishment and mainstream media also ignored his warnings about the looming bust of the housing bubble. He has been downright ridiculed for his statements on the federal reserve and the dangers of inflation.

    He recently stated that the mainstream was coming around to his way of thinking and that the time was right for him to be elected president. I wonder if anyone is listening to him now...

Ron Paul responds to Obama in an interview: Bring all the troops home now!


The campaign of 2012 Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul issued a statement remarking on President Obama’s speech announcing the scheduling of a drawdown of the surge troops sent in to Afghanistan after he took office. (Read Full Statement here)


Please leave a comment, subscribe to the blog, and share it with a friend. Follow me on twitter @ csawordsmith, I'll be on Facebook here, and Linkedin here. Together we can take back our community, take back our state, and take back our Republic. Let the Revolution begin!








    



   





Advertise